Mid- 90 s. New York City. One chilly September evening I strolled with my good friend George north on Sixth Avenue. As we passed a fast-food joint, George asked if I might be curious about among their renowned drinks.
“Oh no,” I said, “my stomach doesn’t take care of dairy also well nowadays.”
“Milk?” George asked, his voice loaded with amazement. “You believe there’s dairy in those shakes? There’s no dairy ,” he stated, trembling his head, adding, “It’s all scientific research ”
George clarified that the ingredients in those trembles were lab-made, heavily crafted, much gotten rid of from what livestock and planet generated. The chain had changed them so heavily, they might make it through a nuclear disaster.
Based upon some internet research I recently performed, the shakes at the time likely had genuine dairy. So George was possibly incorrect on his evaluation. But he was most definitely incorrect calling the crafted active ingredients “scientific research.”
By calling them “science”, George obscured the boundary in between science and technology. That prevails sufficient, to be forgiven. Yet it remains risky, especially when politicians obscure the boundary between their policy and science.